Die Flughafengesellschaft FBB betreibt den Flughafen Berlin Brandenburg Willy Brandt (BER) mit seinen drei Terminals. Berlin ist der drittgrößte Flughafenstandort in Deutschland; gemessen an den ankommenden und abfliegenden Passagieren (ohne Umsteiger) sogar der größte. Die Flughäfen Schönefeld und Tegel fertigten im Jahr 2019, vor der Coronavirus-Pandemie, rund 35,65 Millionen Passagiere ab. Für das Jahr 2020 rechnet die Flughafengesellschaft mit insgesamt rund neun Millionen Passagieren.

The airport company Flughafen Berlin Brandenburg GmbH (FBB) operates Berlin Brandenburg Willy Brandt Airport (BER) with its three terminals. Berlin is the third biggest airport location in Germany and ranks first in terms of origin and destination traffic (not counting connecting passengers). In 2019, before the coronavirus pandemic, the airports in Schönefeld and Tegel handled around 35.65 million passengers. For 2020, the airport company expects a total of around nine million passengers.

vor 6 Jahren

Annual Report 2013

  • Text
  • Berlin
  • Brandenburg
  • Aircraft
  • Tegel
  • Flughafen
  • Assets
  • Passengers
  • Previous
  • Operational
  • Movements
  • Annual

122 | Flughafen Berlin

122 | Flughafen Berlin Brandenburg GmbH With regard to the current utilisation of the state’s own areas at the Berlin airport TXL, it must be noted that the heritable building right agreement from 2008 which established the basis for the utilisation by BFG expired at the end of 2011. As provided in the agreement, BFG applied in due time for an extension of the heritable building right agreement under the same contractual terms and conditions. BFG and the State of Berlin have not been able to reach agreement on the terms and conditions of an extension. The parties’ views differ in particular with respect to these points: • Amount of compensation to be paid by the State of Berlin to BFG • Description of the condition of the property owed by BFG upon its return • Responsibility for any inherited contamination of the buildings / clean-up obligations The State of Berlin wanted to revise the regulations of these issues and has no intention of extending the heritable building right agreement under the current terms and conditions. Utilisation at this time continues on the basis of the content of the previous heritable building right agreement, even though ultimately there is no contractual foundation for this utilisation. BFG and the State of Berlin are negotiating parallel the conclusion of a leasing agreement which will regulate utilisation until the return of the state’s own areas to the State of Berlin and the formalities of the return. The areas owned by the German state are being utilised by BFG on the basis of a heritable building right agreement and a leasing agreement with the Federal Agency for Real Estate Management. This agreement will remain in effect until its cancellation by the parties which BFG can request subsequent to the cessation of flight operations. The leasing contract / heritable building right agreement with the federal government provide that the provisions for the return will be regulated in a separate agreement, which is now in final draft form. B.6 Damage compensation claims arising from postponement of operational startup of BER FBB has received letters of claim from service providers, tenants, airlines and other companies requesting damages / regress payments as a consequence of the postponement of the operational startup of Berlin Brandenburg Airport originally set for 3 June 2012. There are currently two cases pending before courts. Air Berlin and Private Textiles (tenant in the terminal) have filed an action for declaratory judgement and a suit for partial payment against FBB. The majority of the letters have initially

Our Figures | 123 done no more than assert the grounds for the claims; very few of the claim letters include concrete figures or they contain at most estimates. The actions filed by Air Berlin and Private Textiles contain only a provisional value of the actions as well. As a consequence, it is not possible at this time to make any definitive statements regarding the total amount of the claims asserted by the various claimants. FBB is reviewing the claims in consultation with outside legal counsel to determine whether they are justified with respect to their basis and amount. Basically, a distinction must be made between two cases: (1) Claimants who can refer to contractual relationships with FBB (2) Claimants who do not have any contractual relationship with FBB, but can refer to a precontractual obligation. Claimants who do not fall in one of these two categories (such as individual passengers or companies in the airport environs) would have to prove and justify statutory claims pursuant to Section 823 BGB [German Civil Code] owing to the lack of any specific obligations. FBB does not believe that any of the prerequisites required to establish such claims are met. If and when, however, contractual relationships exist, there is a possibility of no-fault liability arising from the claimant’s interest in fulfilment. This claim is more extensive than claims which might arise on the basis of precontractual subsidiary obligations and general obligations to provide information because the latter would be effective solely in the event of FBB’s culpability and would cover fidelity damage only. Basically, it is possible (following a preliminary assessment of the damage or loss asserted by a small number of claimants) to determine clearly that compensation cannot be claimed for many of the cases of asserted damage or loss because they rest on a contractual relationship and ultimately assert the interest in fulfilment and lost profit, to which there is no claim as long as there is no contractual relationship. FBB assumes that a part of the claims will be clarified in the course of litigation because there are new or legally complex issues, especially in those cases of the second group (no contractual relationship), which will require clarification, possibly involving a series of appeals. One major aspect of these actions will be the clarification of the circumstances establishing liability (culpability of FBB). Clarification of this issue by the courts will presumably take a longer period of time. Discernible risks have been given due consideration in the annual accounts by the creation of provisions. The possibility of additional risks cannot be completely excluded, but it is not possible at this time to determine their value with any degree of certainty.

Unsere Publikationen

Annual Report 2019
Geschäftsbericht 2019
Annual Report 2018
Geschäftsbericht 2018
Annual Report 2017
Geschäftsbericht 2017
Annual report 2016
Geschäftsbericht 2016
Annual Report 2015
Geschäftsbericht 2015
Geschäftsbericht 2014
Geschäftsbericht 2013
Annual Report 2012
Geschäftsbericht 2012
Geschäftsbericht 2011
Geschäftsbericht 2010
Annual Report 2009
Wegweiser Flughafen Tegel
Wegweiser Flughafen Schönefeld
Flugplan Sommer 2015 SXF/TXL Timetable Summer 2015
Flugplan Winter 2014/2015 SXF/TXL - Update
Flugplan Winter 2014/2015 SXF/TXL
Flugplan Sommer 2014 SXF/TXL
Flugplan Sommer 2014 SXF/TXL
Nachbarn 11/20
Nachbarn 10/20
Nachbarn 09/20
Nachbarn 08/20
Nachbarn 06/20
Nachbarn 04/20
Nachbarn 03/20
Nachbarn 02/20
Nachbarn 01/2020
Nachbarn 12/2019
Nachbarn 11/2019
Nachbarn 10/2019
Nachbarn 10/2018
Nachbarn 09/2018
Fluglaermbericht 2017
BER aktuell 06/2018
BER aktuell 04/2018
BER aktuell 02/2018
BER aktuell 01/2018
BER aktuell 12/2017
BER aktuell 11/2017
BER aktuell 10/2017
BER aktuell 09/2017
BER aktuell 08/2017
Fluglärmbericht 2016
BER aktuell 07/2017
BER-aktuell 01/2017
BER aktuell 12/2016
BER aktuell 11/2016
BER aktuell 10/2016
BER aktuell 09/2016
BER aktuell 08/2016
BER aktuell 07/2016
BER aktuell 06/2016
Fluglärmbericht 2015
BER aktuell 03/2016
BER aktuell 01/2016
BER aktuell 12/2015
BER aktuell 11/2015
BER aktuell 10/2015
BER aktuell 09/2015
BER aktuell 08/2015
BER aktuell 07/2015
Fluglärmbericht 2014
BER aktuell 06/2015
BER aktuell 05/2015
BER aktuell 04/2015
BER aktuell 03/2015
BER aktuell 02/2015
BER aktuell 01/2015
BER aktuell 12/2014
BER aktuell 11/2014
BER aktuell 10/2014
BER aktuell 09/2014
BER aktuell 07/2014
BER aktuell 06/2014
BER aktuell 01/2014
BER aktuell 05/2014
BER aktuell 04/2014
BER aktuell 03/2014
BER aktuell 02/2014
BER aktuell 12/2013
BER aktuell 11/2013
BER aktuell 10/2013
BER aktuell 09/2013
Umweltbericht 2018
Fluglaermbericht 2018
Umweltbericht 2016
Fluglärmbericht 2016
Umweltbericht 2014
Fluglärmbericht 2014
Fluglärmbericht 2013
Umweltbericht 2012
Fluglärmbericht 2012
Umweltbericht 2011
Gate 66 Frühjahr 2012
Gate 70 Sommer 2013
Gate 67 Herbst 2012
Gate 68 Winter 2012
Gate 69 Frühjahr 2013
Berlin Brandenburg Aircraft Tegel Flughafen Assets Passengers Previous Operational Movements Annual